| |
Category: 18. Literature on triracial isolates and mixed
bloods
GREE001. Greenbaum, Susan. Whats
in a label? Identity problems of Southern Indian tribes. Journal
of Ethnic Studies 19.2 (1991):107-126.
49 references
Publication type: Journal Article
Discusses the criteria outlined by the federal
acknowledgment process (25 CFR 83), by which tribes can petition
the Bureau of Indian Affairs for federal recognition. Although the
federal acknowledgment criteria do not specify any blood quantum threshold
or place limits on amounts of intermarriage with non-Indians, racial bias
can creep into the process through criterion a, which specifies
that the petitioning group must have been continuously identified as Indian
by external entities such as whites and blacks in the region, federal
and local officials, journalists, historians, anthropologists, sociologists,
and other Indian communities.
One way this bias is introduced is through the South's
Jim Crow laws, which were major forces from the 1890s through the end
of World War II. Such laws imposed three-way and even (in Robeson
County) four-way segregation of school systems. Jim Crow laws
and segregation sometimes created a caste system so that Indians were
intermediate between whites and blacks. Another way in which criterion
a can be at odds with the intent of the federal acknowledgement
process to be non-racial is by paying attention to the sociological
and anthropological literature on triracial isolates, or racial islands.
The Lumbee have been included in several of these discussions of non-white/non-black
enclaves in the South, mid-Atlantic, and Northeast.
Gardner provides sound discussion of the explicitly racial
nature of the triracial isolate literature, particularly the assumption
that the communities developed involuntarily as a result of segregation
laws. Gardner observes that another hypothesis -- that these groups
are remnants of Indian tribes -- is not considered in the triracial isolate
literature; moreover, the formal barriers of segregation laws have been
removed, but many of these communities are organizing themselves for federal
recognition as Indian tribes.
This annotation was edited on: June 24, 2004.
Home Page URL: lumbeebibliography.net |
|